Pyarelal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the criminal revision petition under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, setting aside impugned orders denying bail. Directed the juvenile's release on bail upon furnishing a personal bond by the guardian and a surety bond.
What did the court decide?
Impugned orders dated 27.02.2017 and 20.02.2017 set aside; petitioner directed to be released on bail with personal and surety bonds.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 446 / 2017
Pyarelal S/o Shri Dedaram,by Caste Choukidar, Resident of Chandawal, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali (since Minor) Through His Father and Natural Guardian Dedaram S/o Shri Chimna Ram,, By Caste Choukidar, Resident of Chandawal, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali. (Presently Under the Custody of Observation Home, Pali)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumbhat
For Respondent(s) : Mr. L.R. Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
12/04/2017
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the juvenile petitioner should be released on bail under Section 12(1) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 despite the nature of the alleged offence.
Whether sufficient grounds were recorded to deny bail and prevent the juvenile's release.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pyarelal S/o Shri Dedaram
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/446/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court