This order dismisses a criminal revision petition challenging a Family Court's award of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The High Court held that the lower court reasonably awarded maintenance from the filing date and the amount was not exorbitant.
Revision petition dismissed; Stay application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 371 / 2017
Kamlesh Sharma Son of Shri Jagdish Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bagavda, Tehsil and District Sawaimadhopur At Present R/o Loha Meel, Radha Madhav Gaushala Ke Pass, Kherda, Sawaimadhopur Tehsil and District Sawaimadhopur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hemant Sharma for Mr. Sarthak Rastogi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
16/08/2017
(2 of 3)
[CRLR-371/2017]
tune of Rs. 2500/- per month to respondent No. 1 and Rs. 2000/each to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 who are sons of the petitioner.
(3 of 3)
[CRLR-371/2017]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI), J.
Amit/32
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court erred in awarding maintenance from the date of filing of the application without assigning reasons.
Whether the amount of maintenance awarded is exorbitant to invoke revisional jurisdiction.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Qamruddin vs. Rashida II (1992) DMC 328Referred¶20
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamlesh Sharma
Vidhya Gautam
Naitik Sharma
Annu Sharma
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
