The High Court at Jodhpur disposed of a criminal revision where the petitioner's counsel craved liberty to withdraw the appeal after argument. The court dismissed the revision on the grounds of withdrawal.
Revision dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 242 / 2017
Deena Ram S/o Shri Bhagu Ram, Beetan, P.S. Gotan District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Anand Purohit Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kapil Purohit.
For Respondent(s) : Dhirendra Singh,Mr.Rajeev Bishnoi.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
04/10/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner craves liberty to withdraw
the instant revision after arguing the same at some length.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.
/tarun goyal/
Deena Ram S/o Shri Bhagu Ram
State of Rajasthan
Madan Lal S/o Jala Ram
Sandeep Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
