The petitioner sought cancellation of a supurdaginnama regarding a damaged vehicle. The Court allowed the petition, noting the vehicle was beyond repair and the Delhi Court had already cancelled the charge.
Cancellation of the supurdaginnama of the vehicle Tata Safari Decor-8-CM7914.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 963 / 2017
Dr. Soniya Jindal D/o Shri Ramniwas Jindal, R/o B-19, Ist Floor, Vandana Apartment, Sector-13, Rohini, Delhi-110085 Through Power of Attorney Holder Namely Shri Ashish Thakur S/o Shri Nagendra Kumar, R/o D/194, Sector-6, Rohini, Delhi-85
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.K. Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sonia Sandilya, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
02/05/2017
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-963/2017]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI), J.
Arti/28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the supurdaginnama of a vehicle which is completely damaged and has been cancelled by the Delhi Court should be cancelled in proceedings before this High Court.
Dr. Soniya Jindal
State of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
