Amit Jain v. State of Raj and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this criminal miscellaneous petition, the High Court stopped the pending criminal reference for section 420 IPC and section 468, 471 IPC, and section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, which was not compoundable, as the parties had reached a settlement and were appearing before the court for a compromise.
What did the court decide?
The referring parties requested the matter to be listed for consideration of the reference under Section 420 IPC.
What the court decided
1 S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 5170/2017
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB t;iqjA
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 5170 / 2017
Amit Jain S/o Shri Nemichand B/c Jain, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No. 19, Shriram Nagar-B, Khirani Phatak, Jhotwara, Jaipur (raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
- State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
- Ritu Jain D/o Jitendra Kumar Jain B/c Jain, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 451, Tikkiwalo Ka Rasta, Kishanpole Bazar, Jaipur.
----Respondents
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh ujsUnz dqekj lSuhA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,u ,l 'ks[kkorA v;kph la- 2 ds vf/koDrk Jh vfuy mieuA
U;k;ky; }kjk %
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending criminal reference for section 420 Indian Penal Code should be stopped due to the settlement under Section 174 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amit Jain
- respondent
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
- respondent
Ritu Jain
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/5170/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court