The High Court set aside a Revision Petitioner requesting a public prosecutor to serve notice to the lower court regarding the appointment of a prosecution lawyer.
The application was dismissed; the decision was not appealable under section 482 CrPC as it was discretionary and not appealable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 3628/2017 Harichand & Anr. Vs. State of Raj.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 3628/2017
Harichand & Anr.
Vs.
State of Raj.
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
;kphx.k ds vf/koDrk Jh izgykn 'kekZA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh oh-,l- xksnkjkA
%% vkns'k %% 20-09-2017
U;k;ky; }kjk %
v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] vfrfjDr eq[; egkuxj eftLVªsV] dze la[;k &18] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk izdj.k la[;k& 294@2016 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 27-04-2017] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ;kphx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls fxjQ~rkjh okj.V dks tekurh okj.V esa ifjofrZr djus ds dze esa izLrqr izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 70¼2½ n.M izfdz;k lafgrk vLohdkj fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kphx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls
2
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 3628/2017 Harichand & Anr. Vs. State of Raj.
QkStnkjh fofo/k ;kfpdk /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
lquk x;kA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kphx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k us izdV fd;k fd os bl QkStnkjh ;kfpdk ds xq.kkoxq.k ij cy ugha nsrs gSa] ysfdu mudk fuosnu jgk fd ;kphx.k gfjpUn tkV ,oa fueZy 'kekZ l{ke U;k;ky; esa leiZ.k dj nsaxs] vr% l{ke U;k;ky; dks mlh fnu ;kphx.k ds }kjk izLrqr tekur vkosnu dk fuLrkj.k djus ckcr funsZ'k fn;k tk,A
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd dks ;kphx.k }kjk l{ke U;k;ky; esa leiZ.k dj izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus esa ,srjkt ugha gSA
mijksDrkuqlkj ;g QkStnkjh fofo/k ;kfpdk bl funsZ'k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd ;kphx.k gfjpUn tkV ,oa fueZy 'kekZ ;fn e/;kg~u iwoZ (before lunch) l{ke U;k;ky; ds le{k leiZ.k djrs gSa vkSj muds }kjk leiZ.k djus ds i'pkr l{ke U;k;ky; esa fu;fer tekur vkosnu is'k fd;k tkrk gS rks l{ke U;k;ky; i{kksa dks lqudj] fof/k vuqlkj xq.kkoxq.k ij] bl vkns'k ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk] tgkWa rd lEHko gks lds] mlh fnu tekur vkosnu dk fuLrkj.k djus dk iz;kl djsA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@&
mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sub-ordinate courts can apply Section 482 CrPC to appoint a public prosecutor to list meal cases for review against a District Court order.
Whether the mandamus to allow charge-sheet filing in these cases was discretionary and not appealable under section 482 CrPC.
Harichand & Anr.
State of Raj.
J. egsUnz ekgs'ojh
J. izgykn 'kekZ
y yksd vfHk;kstd
J. oh-,l- xksnkjk
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
