Shafi Ahmad v. State of Rajasthan through Pp.

S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. I2691201 3 Shafi Ahmad Son of Shri Bahir~~Ahmad, Aged about 40 years, -8 % * r\ , 1: 0 jf Resident of Meena **oon,,~~~jaria~~ist~ict,aai** Madhopur (Raj.) I >>

... Accused-Petitioner

Versus

State of

Respondent

various relevant provisions ofthe Code under Chapter XIV and of the principles of law enunciated by this Court in a series of decisions relating to the exercise of the extra-ordinary power under Article 226 or the inherent powers Under Section 482 of the Code which we have extracted and reproduced above, we give the following categories of cases by way of illustration wherein such power could be exercised either to prevent abuse ofthe process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends ofjustice, though it may not be

possible to lay down any precise, clearly defined and suflciently channelised and inflexible guidelines or rigid formulae and to give an exhaustive list of myriad kinds of cases wherein such power should be exercised.

I. Where the allegations made in the First Information R.eport'o.r7the complaint, even if they are taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima-facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused.