Allowed

Surendra Kumar Saini v. State of Rajasthan through P P

Rajasthan HC3 Jul 2017CRLMB/7669/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge allowed bail to the accused-petitioner in a cheating and unfair examination offence case. He considered the completion of investigation and filing of charge-sheet, granting release subject to furnishing personal and surety bonds.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Surendra Kumar Saini Vs State of Rajasthan through P P — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7669 / 2017

¶3

Surendra Kumar Saini Son of Shri Hanuman Sahay, by Caste Mali, Aged About 50 Years, R/o A-13, Jai Ambe Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur. (at Present in Jail).

¶4

----Accused-Petitioner

¶5

State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

¶6

----Respondent

¶7

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary

¶8

For State : Mr. B.N. Sandhu, AAG along with

¶9

Mr. S.K. Saini, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

03/07/2017

¶13

The present Misc bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the Accused/ petitioner Surendra Kumar Saini in the matter of FIR No. 15/2017 registered at Police Station CID (SOG), Jaipur for offences punishable under Sections 420, 120-B IPC and Section 3, 4, 5, 6 and 6-A of Rajasthan Public Examination (Use of Unfair Means) Act, 1992.

¶14

Learned counsel for petitioner Mr. Pradeep Chaudhary submits that the alleged offence is triable by first class Magistrate and after investigation charge-sheet has been filed, petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2017, trial shall take its own time, therefore petitioner may be released on bail.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-7669/2017]

¶17

Learned Additional Advocate General Mr. B.N. Sandhu and learned Public Prosecutor Mr. S.K. Saini opposed the bail application and submit that the alleged offence is anti-social, therefore, the bail application may be rejected.

¶18

I have considered the submissions made at bar.

¶19

On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the

¶20

respective parties and the material made available for my perusal, therefore without expressing any final opinion on the merit and de-merit of the case and specially considering the period of detention and the fact that investigation has already been completed, charge-sheet has been filed, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the accused-petitioner Surendra Kumar Saini.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed.

¶22

Therefore, it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Surendra Kumar Saini Son of Shri Hanuman Sahay in FIR No. 15/2017 registered at Police Station CID (SOG) Jaipur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before the Trial Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(BANWARI LAL SHARMA)J.

¶24

S. Kumawat/32

Surendra Kumar Saini v. State of Rajasthan through P P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Kumar Saini v. State of Rajasthan through P P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daya Ram Vs State

Satpal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Ali Mohd and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Nawal @ Sussa Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Mohammad Hasam and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Shankar Lal Chopra Vs State of Rajasthan through P P