Allowed

Khyali Ram v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC10 Apr 2017CRLMB/3226/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting interim bail to an accused in a criminal case lodged under various IPC sections and Dowry Act, admitting the matter to summary trial due to full compliance, and directing the police to continue investigation.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on bail subject to a bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and Rs. 50,000/- each as per the conditions mentioned.

Khyali Ram Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

ORDER

¶4

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail No. 3226 / 2017

¶5

Khyali Ram Son of Richhpal, by Caste Mali,, R/o Rasnali, Police Station Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

¶6

(at Present Languishing in Sub Jail, Behror, District Alwar)

¶7

----Accused/Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

----Respondent

vkns'k fnukad%

10-04-2017

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh cuokjh yky 'kekZ

¶14

Jh t;fd'ku ;ksxh] vf/koDrk& izkFkhZ dh vksj lsA Jh thrsUnz Jhekyh] yksd vfHk;kstd okLrs jkT;A Jh ekejkt tkV] vf/koDrk& ifjoknh dh vksj lsA

¶15

vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZ us viuh tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds v/khu iqfyl Fkkuk& uhejk.kk] ftyuk&vyoj esa iathc) dh x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 93@2016 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 406] 386] 387 o 354 Hkk-na-la- ,oa 4@6 efgyk vof'k"V :is.k vf/kfu;e ds lEcU/k esa izLrqr fd;k gSA

¶16

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ us fuosnu fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ dk iwoZ dk tekur vkosnu pktZ'khV is'k gksus ds ckn nwljk tekur vkosnu is'k djus dk vf/kdkj lqjf{kr j[krs gq, okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij vLohdkj fd;k x;k FkkA izkFkhZ fnukad 13-12-2016 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k esa vc vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k fd;k tk pqdk gSA eq[; vfHk;qDr VsdpUn lSuh mQZ ykyk rFkk lg&vfHk;qDr tfru ds tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tk pqds gSaA vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dh lqfo/kk dk ykHk fn;k tkosA

¶17

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk fo}ku vf/koDRkk ifjoknh Jh ekejkt tkV us mijksDr rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr f}rh; tekur vkosnu dks vLohdkj fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

lquk x;k rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k djk;h x;h lkexzh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶20

izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k djk;h x;h lkexzh rFkk fo'ks"kdj bl rF; dks ns[krs gq, fd izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iw.kZ gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS rFkk izkFkhZ fnukad 13-122016 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS rFkk vkjksfir vijk/k izFke Js.kh eftLVªsV }kjk fopkj.kh; gS] eSa izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vfUre jk; O;Dr fd;s fcuk vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZ dks /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ikrk gwaA

¶21

vr% vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZ [;kyhjke iq= fjNiky] tkfr&ekyh] fuoklh ftyk&vyoj }kjk :i;s 1]00]000@& ¼,d yk[k :i;s ek=½ dk Lo;a dk ca/k i= rFkk :i;s 50]000@& & 50]000@& ¼ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s ek=½ :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V dh is'k dh tkos] rks mls izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 93@2016 iqfyl Fkkuk&uhejk.kk] ftyk&vyoj ls lEcfU/kr izdj.k esa bl 'krZ ds lkFk tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos fd og izdj.k dh lquokbZ ds nkSjku U;k;ky; }kjk cqyk;s tkus ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxkA

¶22

¼cuokjh yky 'kekZ½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶23

feRry@18

Khyali Ram v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khyali Ram v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr N M Khandelwal Vs Vice Chancellor M D S Universi

Kailash Chand Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan through P.P.

Jang Bhadur Singh Vs Ramrati

Mahadevi Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Priya Greenland Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mitra Grih Nirman Sehkari Samiti LTDandORS

Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp