Allowed

Surendra Singh@Chhinder v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC6 Dec 2017CRLMB/16698/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed three bail applications filed by accused persons facing charges of robbery, theft, criminal conspiracy, and violation of the Arms Act. The court directed their release on personal and surety bonds subject to their appearance in subsequent hearings.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail subject to a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each appearing in all subsequent dates of hearing.

Surendra Singh@Chhinder Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Dowry and Cruelty | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 16697 / 2017

¶3

Shailender Singh @ Chhinder S/o Shri Jangeer Singh B/c Rai Sikh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Khareta Police Station Tatarpur Tehsil Mundawar Distt. Alwar. At Present in Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas Distt. Alwar.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 16698 / 2017 Surendra Singh @ Chhinder son shri Preetam, B/c Rai Sikh, aged about 21 years, Resident of Kushalbas (Rundh) Police Station Tatarpur Tehsil Mundawar District Alwar. At present in Sub Jail, Kishangarhbs District Alwar.

¶10

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan Through Pp ----Respondent

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 16699 / 2017 Trilok Singh S/o Shri Makkhan Singh, B/c Rai Sikh, aged about 18 years, R/o Papdabas, Tehsil Pahadi District Bharatpur. At present in sub Jail, Kishangarhbas District Alwar.

¶12

----Petitioner Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh

¶15

For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, P.P.

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Order

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-16697/2017]

06/12/2017

Petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

¶22

F.I.R. No. 167/2017 was registered at Police Station Tatarpur Distt. Alwar for offence under Sections 395, 455, 120-B of I.P.C. and Section 3/25 of Arms Act.

¶23

It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that similarly situated co-accused have been given benefit of bail by this Court.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed these bail applications.

¶25

I have considered the contentions.

¶26

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioners, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications.

¶27

These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioners shall be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶28

A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.

¶29

(PANKAJ BHANDARI), J.

¶30

Amit/80-82

Surendra Singh@Chhinder v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Singh@Chhinder v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Omprakash Vs Manohar Lal Kaloya and Ors.

State of Rajasthan Vs Surendra Singh Sindhu and Ors.

State of Rajasthan Vs Surendra Singh Sindhu

Nirmal Singh Gurjar Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Madan Lal Vs Mathura Lal

Smt Rajesh Gautam and Anr. Vs State of Raj and Ors.