Mukesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In an order dismissing second bail applications, the High Court held them not pressed as counsel did not want to pursue them, resulting in dismissal without adjudication on merits.
What did the court decide?
Bail applications dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B.Criminal Misc. II Bail No. 1641 / 2017
Kassam Ali S/o Faizkhan,, By Caste Musalman, R/o Ward No.1, Keshrisinghpur, Tehsil Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar. (At Present Lodged in Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan
----Respondent Connected With S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. II BAIL No. 1642 / 2017 Mukesh S/o Shishpal,, By Caste Meghwal, R/o Ward No. 6, Dashmesh Colony, Kodiyanwali Puli, Purani Abadi, District Sri Ganganagar. (At Present Lodged in Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)
----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.K. Garg Mr. Kaushal Gautam
For Respondent(s) : Mr. O.P. Rathi, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kassam Ali S/o Faizkhan
- petitioner
Mukesh S/o Shishpal
- respondent
The State of Rajasthan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/1642/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court