The petitioner was granted bail in a theft case involving a motorcycle. The High Court allowed the bail application without examining merits, ordering the petitioner's release subject to the Trial Court's satisfaction.
Petitioner admitted to bail, subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
ORDER
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.1617/2017
Gopal @ Kailash @ Dagaliya S/o Bhinwaram B/c Bawriya, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bhatawali Ki Talai, Tanwatika, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, At Present Bansada, Police Station Fagi, District Jaipur Rural. (At Present Confined in Central Jail, Jaipur).
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
Date of Order: February 23, 2017
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Mr. Shantnu Bansal, for the petitioner. Mr. V. Godara, P.P. for the State.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in FIR No.467/2016 registered at Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur, for offences u/S. 379 Indian Penal Code 1860.
Heard.
Petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2016. Challan
has already been presented in the Court and conclusion of trial may take time. It is a case of theft of motorcycle. It is a case of magisterial trial.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioner be
admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.
(SABINA),J.
Tanwar/-
P.A.
Item No.5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a theft case pending magisterial trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gopal @ Kailash @ Dagaliya
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
