A bail petition under Section 439 CrPC for an offence under Section 379 IPC was allowed. The court granted bail without expressing an opinion on the merits as the petitioner, having jumped bail, was now in custody since 28.8.2017, subject to Trial Court satisfaction.
Petitioner is admitted to bail subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS BAIL NO. 13901/2017
Aslam S/o Habeeb B/c Musalman, R/o Hathi Darwaja, Bada Bazar, Goverdhan, Police Station Goverdhan, District Mathura, UP. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Bharatpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent : Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar, P.P.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order
13/10/2017
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No.186/2009 registered at Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur for offence under Section 379 Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Heard.
Although, petitioner had jumped bail but now he is in custody since 28.8.2017.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Trial Court.
(SABINA)J.
Mohita/95
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Petitioner, who jumped bail but is now in custody, shall be granted regular bail without expressing opinion on merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aslam S/o Habeeb
State of Rajasthan Through PP
Sabina J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
