Allowed

Sumit Kumar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC6 Sept 2017CRLMB/10041/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court observed that the investigation was completed and the charge-sheet filed. The offender was triable by a first-class magistrate with no other pending cases.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 and two surety bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each to be furnished to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Sumit Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 10041 / 2017

¶3

Sumit Kumar S/o Shri Suresh Chand B/c Khati, R/o Tatarpur, Police Station Khushkheda, District Alwar. (At Present Confined At Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar

¶9

For State : Mr. S.K. Saini, Public Prosecutor

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

06/09/2017

¶13

The present Misc bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the Accused/ petitioner in the matter of FIR No. 271/2017 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, District Alwar, for offence punishable under Section 394 of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 24.05.2017, investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has already been filed. The alleged offence is triable by first class Magistrate, no other criminal case is pending against the present petitioner, therefore petitioner may be released on bail.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

¶16

I have considered the submissions made at bar.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-10041/2017]

¶19

On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the

¶20

respective parties and the material made available for my perusal, therefore without expressing any final opinion on the merit and de-merit of the case and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the accused-petitioner.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed.

¶22

Therefore, it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sumit Kumar S/o Shri Suresh Chand in FIR No. 271/2017 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, District Alwar, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- each and two surety bonds of Rs. 1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before the Trial Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(BANWARI LAL SHARMA)J.

¶24

S. Kumawat/09

Sumit Kumar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Kumar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwant Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

State and Anr. Vs Trilok Chand Contractor and Anr.

K.K.Bhatia Krishna Kumar Bhat Vs Central Bureau of Investigatio

Jitendra Kumar Meena Vs Shri Ashok Jain and Anr.

Subhash Sharma and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Hemraj @ Hemu Vs State of Rajasthan through P P