In a leave to appeal against an order dated 16.6.2015, the appellant sought to withdraw the instant application as another application on the same issue was already entertained.
The leave to appeal application no. 251/2016 is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 251 / 2016
gseUr dqekj xqIrk firk LoxhZ; Jh nsoh lgk; th xqIrk vk;q o;Ld fuoklh 25 ,s’o;Z foyk] jRus’oj dkWyksuh x< exjh ‘kkSHkkxiqjk] mn;iqj ¼jkt-½
&&vihykUV@ifjoknh
cuke
Jh euh”k Hk.Mkjh firk Jh fd’ku flag th Hk.Mkjh vk;q o;Ld fuoklh 69&&ds&jksM+] Hkqikyiqjk] mn;iqj ¼jkt-½
&&jsLiksMsUV@vfHk;qDr
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Hemant Kumar present in person.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Order
26/07/2017
The complainant Hemant Kumar states that he has already filed another leave to appeal application against very same impugned order dated 16.6.2015 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, (W.A.C.) Udaipur which has been entertained and thus he may be allowed to withdraw the leave to appeal application no. 251/2016. Thus, the instant application for leave to appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.
/sushil/
Guseur Dasuri Hirak Jairam Luhar Security Pvt. Ltd.
Hemant Kumar
Sandeep Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
