Allowed

State v. Harma Ram and Anr.

Rajasthan HC14 Nov 2017CRLLA/248/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants a criminal leave to appeal by the State against an acquittal by the trial court in a chargesheet related to murder and culpable homicide. The High Court granted admission to the appeal and directed the respondents to furnish bonds to ensure their presence before the Court.

What did the court decide?

Criminal leave to appeal granted against acquittal; memo treated as appeal memo; bonds directed for presence.

State Vs Harma Ram and Anr. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

D.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 248 / 2017

State of Rajasthan

----Appellant

Versus

Harma Ram S/o Kana Ram Ji, B/c Garasiya, Resident of Gura, Post - Merpur, P.S. Bekariya, District Udaipur.

¶7

Meeta Ram S/o Jhum Lal Ji, B/c Garasiya, Resident of Chhibarwadi, P.S. Bekariya, District Udaipur.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vishnu Kachhwaha, PP

¶10

For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Gopawat on behalf of Mr. Bharat Shrimali

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶13

Order

¶14

14/11/2017

¶15

The instant criminal leave to appeal has been filed by the State of Rajasthan under Section 378 (iii) & (i) Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 23.01.2017 passed by learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Sumerpur, Pali in Sessions Case No.14/2013 (55/2014) whereby the learned trial court acquitted the respondents Harma Ram and Meeta Ram from the charges leveled against them for the offence under Sections 302/34, 323, 341 IPC.

¶16

Heard the learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the respondent No.2 Meeta Ram and perused the judgment dated 23.01.2017 passed by the learned trial court.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLLA-248/2017]

¶19

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the findings recorded by the trial court in the light of the evidence on record, we deem it appropriate to grant leave to appeal.

¶20

Consequently, the instant criminal leave to appeal is hereby granted. The memo of leave to appeal may be treated as memo of appeal. The learned counsel for the respondent No.2 is directed to inform the respondent No.2 Meeta Ram to furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of Dy. Registrar (Judicial) Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur on 15.12.2017 to remain present as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

Issue bailable warrants against the respondent No.1 Harma Ram to the tune of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to remain present before this Court on 15.12.2017.

¶22

Admit. Record of the case has already been received.

¶23

After recording the presence of the respondents, the appeal may be placed in due course.

¶24

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG)J.

¶25

(GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS)J.

¶26

Ms/-63

State v. Harma Ram and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State v. Harma Ram and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Shree Plylem Vs Smt Kavita

Au Financiers India Ltd. Vs State and Anr.

Mukesh Das Vs State

Mahendra Vs State and Anr.

State Vs Ram Chandra @ Ramu

Nanak Singh Vs State and Anr.