State v. Chandu Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants leave to the State of Rajasthan to file an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent by the Trial Court, directing the registration of the leave application as an appeal.
What did the court decide?
Leave to appeal allowed; memo treated as appeal; personal bond of Rs.30,000 and surety directed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 227 / 2016 State of Rajasthan
----Appellant
Versus
Chandu Ram S/o Shri Sukhram, B/c Nayak R/o Bolawali, Police Station Sangeriya, District Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr.L.R.Upadhyay, P.P. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Manish Dadhich.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Judgment / Order
06/09/2017
Heard learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the judgment impugned.
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and substantial grounds for grant of leave to the State of Rajasthan for filing an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent vide impugned judgment.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Rajasthan
- respondent
Chandu Ram
Coram
SANDEEP MEHTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLLA/227/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court