Arjun Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the criminal appeal as abated because the sole appellant, Arjun Ram, died after filing but before the disposal of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Criminal appeal dismissed as abated in light of the appellant's death.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 603 / 1994
Arjun Ram son of Bodu Ram b/c Naik, aged about 60-70 Yrs. R/o Nai Abadi, Hanumangarh Town, Distt. Hanumangarh.
……….Appellant
VERSUS
State of Rajasthan
………….Respondent
Counsel For Appellant(s) : None present.
Counsel For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Bhati, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
08/06/2017
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a factual report dated 7.6.2017 prepared by the Station House Officer, Hanumangarh Town, Distt. Hanumangarh wherein, it has been mentioned that the sole appellant Arjun Ram son of Bodu Ram has died.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Arjun Ram son of Bodu Ram b/c Naik
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/603/1994
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court