In an S.B. Criminal Appeal against an order of rejection of bail application under the SC & ST Act, the Rajasthan High Court allowed the appeal and granted regular bail to the appellant, subject to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Appellant admitted to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT
JAIPUR.
ORDER
S.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1941/2017.
Mukesh Singh Son of Shri Kalyan Singh By Caste-Gurjar, Aged 35 years, Resident of – Pahadi Tan Gudia, Police Station Sadar, Dist. Karauli (At present in Dist. Jail, Karauli) Vs.
State of Rajasthan
For Applicant(s) : Shri Raunak Dixit
For State : Shri V.S. Godara P.P.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order
9.11.2017
Appellant has filed this appeal under Section 14-A (2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the SC & ST Act') seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 108/2017 registered at Police Station Sadar Karauli, District Karauli for offence under Section 332, 353 Indian Penal Code 1860, Section 3(2)(VA) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984.
Heard.
Appellant is in custody since 26.10.2017. Co-accused have been granted bail by this court.
Accordingly, this appeal is allowed. Appellant be admitted to bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial court.
(SABINA), J
mrg./40
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal for regular bail should be allowed.
Whether the appellant satisfies the conditions for granting bail.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Mukesh Singh
State of Rajasthan
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
