The High Court adjudicated a restoration application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, condoning the delay in filing and restoring S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.887/2012 to its original number.
The restoration application was allowed and the appeal was restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoraton Application No. 585 / 2015
In
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.887/2012
Leela Devi wife of Vikram Dev, Daughter of Ganpat Ram resident of Village Sarsof, Tehsil Chouthka Barwada, District Sawarimadhopur.
----Objector/appellant
Versus
----Applicant/respondent
….Objector-respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Parmindra Dadhich, Mr. J.K. Moolchandani on behalf of Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Senior Counsel For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Judgment
04/12/2017
Heard counsel for the appellant.
None present on behalf of respondent.
Heard on Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned.
[CRES-585 / 2015]
(2 of 2)
Heard on restoration application. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number.
Office to proceed further.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J.
Jyoti/26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the restoration application should be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Leela Devi
Suresh Kumar
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
