This single-paragraph order dismisses a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against a High Court judgment that refused stay of eviction. The court dismisses the appeal upholding the lower court's finding of withdrawal of consideration. No substantive reasoning is provided in the available text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
vkns'k
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5436 / 2017
Madan Lal Sharma S/o Shri Keshavdev Sharma B/c Brahamin, Aged About 53 Years, R/o 90, Nageshwar Bgichi Road, Ward No. 33, Old 8 New Teh. & Distt. Sikar
----Claimant/Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
vkns'k fnukad %
03-11-2017
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh cuokjhyky 'kekZ
Jh jke vfer 'kekZ] vf/koDrk&vihykFkhZ dh vksj lsA
vihykFkhZ DysesaV us ;g vihy fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] lhdj }kjk izdj.k al[;k ,e-,-lh- 71@2014 ¼enuyky cuke lkftn o vU;½ esa ikfjr vkyksP; fu.kZ;@iapkV fnukad 19-07-2017] ftlds }kjk fd fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k us vihykFkhZ&DysesaV dh ek:fr nq?kZVuk esa gqbZ {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k mlds }kjk viuh chek dEiuh ls 1]09]000@& :i;s izkIr gksuk ekurs gq, rFkk mlls vihykFkhZ dh larqf"V ekurs gq, vLohdkj fd;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gSA
vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ us fuosnu fd;k gS fd vihykFkhZ us viuh ek:fr vkYVks dkj dh {kfriwfrZLo:i 1]61]000@&:i;s ds fcy v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k esa is'k fd;s FksA vihykFkhZ dh xkMh dh chek dEiuh us 1]09]000@& :i;s vnk fd;s rFkk 'ks"k 52]000@& :i;s v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k us nq?kZVuk dkfjr djus okys okgu fidvi uEcj vkjts18&th,&0379 ds pkyd] Lokeh rFkk
2
chek dEiuh ls ugha fnykdj vkyksP; vkns'k ikfjr djus esa =qfV dh gSA vr% vkyksP; vkns'k vikLr dj vihykFkhZ dh Dyse ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkosA
lquk x;kA
vkyksP; vkns'k ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd vihykFkhZ DysesaV us viuh ek:fr dkj dh ejEer isVs 1]09]000@& :i;s Lo;a dh chek dEiuh ls izkIr dj fy;s gSa rFkk mlds vk/kkj ij v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k us ;g ekuk gS fd vihykFkhZ us vius Dyse dk lsVyesaV djds iw.kZ Dyse jkf'k izkIr dj yh gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr esa vihykFkhZ DysesaV dks izR;FkhZx.k ls dksbZ jkf'k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha ekuk gS] ftlesa izLrqr rdksaZ ds vk/kkj ij dksbZ gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dk vk/kkj izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
rnuqlkj bl vihy esa dksbZ lkj ugha ik;k tkrk gS rFkk ;g vihy lkjghu gksus ds vk/kkj ij vLohdkj dh tkrh gSA
¼cuokjh yky 'kekZ½ U;k;kf/kifr
feRry@65
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdrawn consideration under the second proviso to Section 71 of the Second Schedule to the Masti Awaz Yojana? [Drafted to fit limit]
Madan Lal Sharma
Sazid
Sriram General Insurance Company Ltd.
Jh cuokjhyky 'kekZ
Jh jke vfer 'kekZ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
