Petitioners filed a civil contempt petition which was not prosecuted. The bench dismissed the petition after four years due to lack of steps to serve respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 185 / 2013
----Petitioners
Versus
Vishnu Charan Malik, Secretary, Jaipur, Development Authrity, SJLN Marg, Jaipur
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Raghunandan Sharma For Respondent(s) :
_____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.BHANDARI Order
14/11/2017
Learned counsel Mr.Raghunandan Sharma pleads no
instructions.
In view of the above and as the contempt petition is old by more than four years and steps have not been taken to serve the respondents, it is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(MN BHANDARI) J.
Preeti, PA/18
Jagdish Prasad
Pratap Meena
Vishnu Charan Malik
M.N. Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
