The writ petition, listed as likely to be infructuous, was dismissed on the grounds that it had rendered infructuous by the efflux of time. No substantive legal question was resolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Kartar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (S. B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6053/07)
Date of Order : 2.3.16
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA
Mr. S.S. Nirban, for the petitioners. Mr. S.M. Toshniwal, Additional Government Counsel, for the respondents.
The matter is listed today under the Heading “Likely to
be infructuous/covered matters”.
Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that
by efflux of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
(SANGEET LODHA), J.
vij
Kartar Singh & Ors.
State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Sangeet Lodha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
