The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the defendant section of a cooperative bank. Relying on Apex Court judgments, the court held the petition not maintainable as the respondent bank did not fall under Article 12. The petitioner was absent during hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4699/2004
Mahesh Chand Modi Slo Shri Kunj Bihari Lal, Resident of 106168, S.F.S. Mansarowar, Jaipur (Raj.)
.... Petitioner Y I;. ,. j i i ,+?. t' \i=rsts~ 2 \ d( i " .. 1. The aja$an .*.. ?State Co-operative Bank ~imitei, ~~ziphr, through its b '?+ .' i anain~~~irector.
DATE OF ORDER : 1 2/09/2016 HON'BLE MR. J.&TICEiM.N. BHANDARI ... . . " "L ' "' 6 U" . ii'" ,, ,> < 4 a ?.., 'I., ".-' .:: None for petitioner,, >. I#?.. me ::;-q>, /, ..y: fiY ..$ < . < C * _?#.i.t.. .,..~.~8_ - Mr. Rahu1ICamwQ;-f,Gr;respondents - 4.' ,.~ e ,. ~>+< '"... A=1 '<.?%.,# .- ,: , "+ * i " .#: ygj& d : 7 - -. ;@ - (trd' ..' , 1 ' - , , * 2 "". . '..' " ,&p' "' 4 * -.. . - qn Learned cou&ebffor~ 1eP.r,g.gy-4'r iyes t- . P:;m-I.,;.,b 'oi-d@t-ts-2 , submits that writ gq $ * $ .?. ('.* 6 2 . , ,i,t a* < .a I. 3;'; **. ,, : .,-.:r. petition is not maintatn,able.:as,;!respoa$d.6nt-department ., does . r i.. "-,.- .* a - -- "3,s ,' a. .. r p e,., i .;; . Y - not fall under rticl&P 12: ':f'f"2Reh6nstitution of India. A 11 ii- y' :4 : : ). +a t/x a , , reference of judgmen!s 8f 1. theTApex Court in the cases of "I .a& Thalappalam Ser::Co..$o,p: BaiikJitd: . . & Ors. Vs. State of i{@$ +...- ' -7% ,,.,a ..-2" c.: !E $$pJ * , <a <b " % :. t:,. 4; * i Kerala & Ors., re$oij"ed~~n~2013.~1~~~~~5683, . .. -a- S.S. Rana Vs. " ?:;t 8 * I1)$ ,:&,i;a..l , rd 7 Registrar, Co-opel;a$ive- Societies.&: Ans., reported $3 b:S,.'<.** . .. >. , .: .. L2 .a,* in 2006 ,- -. > AIR SCW 3723, General Manager, .. "'i .% x'-- + isa an .. Sahkari Chini Mills b,,'-$se")".$' .'rai %Z 2 9,'3. ,d .p+ ; %@.: <& " r:""' r 9. -." i Ltd., Sultanpur, U.P. s..'atruh"j~irhad & Ors., reported in AIR 2003 SC 4531, Hindu Co-operative Bank Employee's Association (Regd.), Pathankot Vs, State of Punjab & Ors., passed in L.P.A. No.633 of 2012 (0&M) on 16.05.2012 and
2
the judgment of the Bombay High Court in the case of The Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Limited & Anr. Vs. Padubidri Pattabhiram Bhat & Anr., reported in AIR 1993
Bombay 91 has been given. . . 5. :,. > P - In view -df_obj'Jct(~ofi 1:. and theaju"btrriefitd(supra), -2, d ,T& .., this writ t .id. petition ~is.c)smissed as not maintainable. It i&m$tqo when i -2 .a " eh none,.h& appeared for the petitioner despite case was'called in _\a,v_ 'r different rounds. I_
FRBOHRA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging acts of a cooperative bank is maintainable as the respondent falls under Article 12 of the Constitution.
Whether the High Court should exercise jurisdiction to adjudicate on issues between cooperative bank and its employees.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Thalappalam Specialist Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. State of Kerala & Ors.Doubted¶6
Thalappalam Specialist Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Ors. Vs. State of Kerala & Ors., reported in 2013 SCC 5683 · Who else cites this
S.S. Rana Vs. Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Ans.Referred¶6
S.S. Rana Vs. Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Ans., reported in SCC 2006 AIR SCW 3723 · Who else cites this
General Manager, Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. Sultanpur U.P. Vs. State through Union of India & Ors.Referred¶6
General Manager, Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. Sultanpur U.P. Vs. State through Union of India & Ors., reported in AIR 2003 SC 4531
Hindu Co-operative Bank Employee's Association (Regd.) Pathankot Vs. State of Punjab & Ors.Referred¶6
Hindu Co-operative Bank Employee's Association (Regd.) Pathankot Vs. State of Punjab & Ors., passed in L.P.A. No.633 of 2012 on 16.05.2012
The Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Limited & Anr. Vs. Padubidri Pattabhiram Bhat & Anr.Referred¶8
The Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Limited & Anr. Vs. Padubidri Pattabhiram Bhat & Anr., reported in AIR 1993 Bombay 91
Mahesh Chand Modi
G.S. Raje Sanjib State Cooperative Bank Limited
Deputy General Manager (Personnel) Rajasthan State Cooperative Bank Limited
M.N. Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
