C M R S R T C v. Smt Patasi Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petitioner corporation challenged the Labour Court's computation of wages for an intervening period. The High Court held no illegality existed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed finding no illegality in the impugned order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S. B. Civil Writ ~eti tion No. 3541/2016
order
chi ef Manager, Raj asthan State Road Transport Corporation, Kotputli Depot, ~aipur
.... PETITIONER
VERSUS
smt. Patasi Devi W/o Late shri Hanuman singh, Ex. Driver, Kotputli Depot, R/o ~agal peel a, ~arnaul , Haryana, through shri B.M. Bagra.
.... RESPONDENT
Date of order : 29.09.2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI
Mr. vinayak Joshifor petitioner/s.
BY this writ petition, a challenge is made to the order dated 25.8.2015 passed It is on an by the Labour court, Jaipur. application under 'section 33(c) (2) of the ~ndustrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short the "~ct of 1947"). he computation of wages ha3 been made
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether benefit for wages of the intervening period can be computed without an order of reinstatement.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Kotputli Depot, Jaipur
- respondent
Smt. Patasi Devi W/o Late Shri Hanuman Singh
Coram
M.N. Bhandari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/3541/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court