A writ petition in a service matter became infructuous as the respondent counsel stated the impugned order was withdrawn for all petitioners except one who had joined the post. The Court dismissed the petition accordingly but allowed recall.
The writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3540/2016
Hanuman Prasad Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Date of Order: 13th July, 2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.BHANDARI
Mr.Divesh Sharma for Mr.Shobhit Tiwari, for the petitioner. Mr.Krishnaveer Singh for Mr.Anurag Sharma, AAG – for the State.
By this Court:
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that impugned order has been withdrawn for all the petitioners leaving one, who has already joined the post. In view of the above, this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous. The petitioners would, however, be at liberty to file an application for recall of this order, if statement of learned counsel for the respondents is found to be otherwise.
(M.N.BHANDARI), J.
S/No.305
Preeti, PA
All cor r ect ion s m ade in t h e j u dgm en t / or der h ave been in cor por at ed in t h e j u dgm en t / or der bein g em ailed.
Pr eet i Asopa P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to the withdrawal of the impugned order for most petitioners?
Hanuman Prasad Yadav & Ors.
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
M.N. BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
