Disposed

Kanti Lal Trivedi v. State and Ors.

Rajasthan HC11 Jan 2016CW/348/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a writ petition by directing the respondent to accept notice and requiring the petitioner to submit a detailed representation. The Court mandated the appropriate authority to consider the grievance based on prior judgments, pass a reasoned order within eight weeks, and grant any benefit within two weeks thereafter if entitled.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of. The petitioner was directed to submit a detailed representation to the appropriate authority. The authority is directed to pass a reasoned order within eight weeks a

Kanti Lal Trivedi Vs State and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.

¶2

¶3

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.348/2016

¶4

(KANTI LAL TRIVEDI V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.)

¶5

¶6

DATE OF ORDER 11.01.2016

¶7

HON'BLE MS JAISHREE THAKUR, J

¶8

Mr.K.K.Patel for the petitioner. Mr.Mr.Manish Patel, AGC for the State.

¶9

Heard.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the order rendered by a coordinate bench of this court in a bunch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3141/2015 (Jagdish Chandra Khatik & Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan & Ors. ) which were decided in the light of judgment dated 29.07.2009 rendered in the case of Jagdish Bhanoda V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.773/2009) which has been ultimately affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

¶11

Issue notice as to why this petition for writ be not accepted as prayed. Mr.Manish Patel, learned Additional Government Counsel who is present in the court is directed to accept the notices. Let two copies of writ petition be served upon Mr. Manish Patel during the course of the day.

¶12

Learned counsel for respondents does not dispute this factual position.

¶13

Having perused the pleadings in the writ petition, this court finds that the matter in hand can be disposed of by requiring the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the appropriate authority for agitating his grievance along with a copy of this order. Once, the representation is received, the appropriate authority shall objectively consider and decide his grievance in the ratio of the judgment rendered in the case of Jagdish Bhanoda V/s State of

¶14

Rajasthan & Ors. by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

¶15

In case, the petitioner is found entitled to any benefit, the same shall be granted to him immediately preferably within a period of two weeks thereafter. If any grievance of the petitioner still survives, he shall be at liberty to approach this court thereafter.

¶16

In view of above, the above noted writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶17

[JAISHREE THAKUR],J.

¶18

Anil Singh

Kanti Lal Trivedi v. State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanti Lal Trivedi v. State and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Virendra Singh Vs State and Ors.

Gopal Lal Tolambia and Ors. Vs State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and Anr.

Jagdish Gir Vs State and Ors.

Zakir Husain Vs State and Anr.

Metu Kanwar Vs State and Ors.

Noor Mohd., Vs State and Ors.