Disposed

Amit Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Rajasthan HC22 Sept 2016CRLMP/928/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three criminal misc. petitions and stay applications were disposed of. The High Court held that the investigation is ongoing and no case for quashment exists. The IO was directed to conclude investigation.

What did the court decide?

No case for quashment of FIRs is made out. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude investigation at the earliest and submit the result.

Amit Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 928/2016

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR.

¶4

ORDER

¶5

(1) S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 928/2016 WITH

¶6

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. STAY APPLICATION NO. 977/2016

¶7

Amit Kumar Sharma, son of Shri Banwari Lal Shrama, age about 34 years, by caste Brahmin, resident of A-37, Staya Nagar, Rajputana Marg, Jhotwara, Police Station Jhotwara, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶8

Complainant-Petitioner

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

State of Rajasthan through P.P

¶11

Director General of Police, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶12

Superintendent of Police, Jaipur Rural, Jaipur (Raj).

¶13

Station House Officer, Police Station Govindgarh, Jaipur, Rajasthan

¶14

Respondents

¶15

WITH

¶16

(2) S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 27/2016 WITH

¶17

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. STAY APPLICATION NO. 61/2016

¶18

Kailash Chand Agrawal S/o Late Shri Sanwar Mal Agrawal, R/o Ward No.- 11, Patwariyon Ka Mohalla, Chopar, Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶19

Accused-Petitioner

¶20

Versus

¶21

State of Rajasthan, through P.P.

¶22

¶23

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 928/2016

¶24

Shri Amit Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Banwari Lal Sharma, R/o A-37, Satya Nagar, Rajputana Marg, Jhotwara, P/s Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶25

Complainant/Respondent

¶26

WITH

¶27

(3) S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 929/2016 WITH

¶28

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. STAY APPLICATION NO. 978/2016

¶29

Vinit Sharma Son of Shri Hari Prakash Sharma, aged 31 years, by caste Brahmin, Resident of House No. 384, Village & Post Kheda Khurd, Delhi, At present working as Branch Manager, Bank of Maharashtra, Branch Govindgarh, District Jaipur (Raj.)

¶30

Accused/Petitioner

¶31

Versus

¶32

The State of Rajasthan through P.P

¶33

Respondent

¶34

Amit Kumar Sharma Son of Shri Banwari Lal Sharma, Resident of A-37, Satya Nagar, Rajputana Marg, Jhotwara, Police Station Jhotwara, District Jaipur (Raj.)

¶35

Complainant/Respondent

¶36

DATE OF ORDER : 22.09.2016

¶37

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ

¶38

Mr. K.K. Chhawal, Mr. Naveen Kumar Sharma on behalf of Mr. Ram Manohar Sharma, Mr. Sumit Khandelwal, for the petitioners.

¶39

Mr. N.S. Dhakad, Public Prosecutor, for Respondent-State. Mr. S. Vashishtha, for the complainant. Mr. Laxman Singh, ASI and I.O., P.S. Govindgarh, Jaipur Rural, present in person.

¶40

¶41

S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO. 928/2016

¶42

BY THE COURT:

¶43

Mr. Laxman Singh, Investigating Officer and Assistant Sub Inspector, P.S. Govindgarh, Jaipur Rural is present in the Court and has submitted progress report of the case, which is taken on record. As per investigating officer, he has received report of Forensic Science Laboratory and he is in the process of formulating result of investigation.

¶44

In view of above, no case for quashment of FIR is made out. However, the investigating officer is set at liberty to conclude the investigation at the earliest and submit his result of investigation before the concerned court.

¶45

With the aforesaid direction and observation, all

¶46

the petitions are disposed off.

¶47

Stay applications also stand disposed off.

¶48

Office is directed to place a copy of this order on

¶49

record of each connected matter.

¶50

(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J.

¶51

Manoj, S.NO.28-30.

Amit Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Singh Vs M D R S R T C and Anr.

Babu Lal Sharma and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Smt Puja Bali Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Om Prakash Kharwal Vs Hanuman Singh and Others

Mukesh Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Praveen Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.