This order grants bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The High Court, without examining the merits, deemed it just and proper to release him on personal bond and sureties.
Bail granted with personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
O R D E R
S.B.CR. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 11303/2016
(Devendra Singh vs. State of Rajasthan )
DATE OF ORDER ::::: 02/09/2016
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, for the petitioner/s.
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, Public Prosecutor for State.
This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No. 109/2016 was registered at P.S. Rajakheda, Distt. Dholpur for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner(s) was/were arrested. Thereafter he/she/they moved the bail application before the trial court, who vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner(s).
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has contended that the co-accused has been released on bail vide order dated 22.08.2016 and the case of the petitioner is on better footing than the co-accused. He further contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, he has nothing to do with the alleged crime, there is no case made out against the petitioner(s). It has also been contended that the accused petitioner(s) is/are in judicial lockup since long and the conclusion of trial of the case is likely to take time,hence the accused petitioner(s) should be released on bail.
On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner(s)
2
on bail.
Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner(s) Devendra Singh S/o Shri Autar Singh shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with afore-mentioned FIR provided he/she/they furnish(es) a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lac) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lac) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he/she/they shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.
Om/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused petitioner is entitled to be released on bail pending trial under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devendra Singh
State of Rajasthan
MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
