Partly allowed

Vinod Singh v. Krishan Kumar and Others

Rajasthan HC21 Jul 2016CMA/3512/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, in a civil miscellaneous appeal against a Tribunal's award, held that the Tribunal failed to appreciate facts and grounds. The judgment is partly allowed, the award is quashed, and the matter is remanded with directions for a fresh hearing.

What did the court decide?

Impugned judgment and award quashed; matter remanded to Tribunal with directions to decide afresh after notice and hearing.

Vinod Singh Vs Krishan Kumar and Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶3

JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR.

¶4

J U D G M E N T

¶5

S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.3512/2013 (RSRTC Versus Smt. Shakuntala Sharma & Ors.)

¶6

DATE OF JUDGMENT : 21.07.2016

¶7

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶8

Mr. Virendra Agarwal, counsel for appellant(s) None is present for the respondents

¶9

This appeal has been filed by the appellant(s) against the judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal.

¶10

At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant(s) submits that the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned judgment and award has not taken into consideration the grounds which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal(s). The finding of learned Tribunal on issue no. 2, 4 & 4A is contrary to the material available on record. Thus, the impugned judgment and award passed by the learned Tribunal qua aforesaid issue(s) be quashed and set aside and the matter should be remanded to the learned Tribunal with the direction to decide the matter afresh qua aforesaid issue(s) in the light of grounds which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal(s).

¶11

I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and carefully perused the relevant material on record including the impugned judgment and award.

¶12

In my considered view, the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned judgment and award has not appreciated the facts of the case and the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) by way of instant appeal(s) in a proper manner and passed the impugned judgment and award surreptitiously. Thus, the impugned judgment

¶13

¶14

and award passed by the learned Tribunal needs interference by this court.

¶15

In the result, the appeal(s) is/are partly allowed; the impugned judgment and award passed by learned Tribunal qua aforesaid issue(s) is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal with the direction to decide the matter afresh qua aforesaid issue(s) as early as possible, in the light of grounds raised by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) by way of the aforesaid appeal(s) and the judgment(s) to be cited by learned counsel for the parties, if any, after issuing notice to all the concerned parties and giving opportunity of hearing to them.

¶16

Learned counsel for the appellant has requested for a specific date for their appearance before the Tribunal, hence they are directed to appear before the learned Tribunal on 5.10.2016.

¶17

Record, if any, be sent back.

¶18

(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

¶19

¶20

All corrections made in the judgment / order have been incorporated in the judgment / order being E-mailed.

¶21

Dilip Khandelwal

¶22

Vinod Singh v. Krishan Kumar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Singh v. Krishan Kumar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Imla Devi and Ors. Vs Shri Satyaveer Singh @ Chandra

Ummed Singh and Others Vs Ramphal and Others

Vimla Sharma and Ors. Vs Shri Ashok Sampat Ram and Others

Rajendra Singh and Ors. Vs Om Prakash and Ors.

Dal Jeet Singh and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

National Insurance Comp Ltd. Vs Rajendra Yadav and Ors.