Dropadi v. Hansraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR O R D E R
S.B.Civil Misc.Appeal No.1329/2004 (Dropadi Vs. Hansraj)
Date of Order :::::
02.05.2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Mr.Raunak Singhvi for Mr.Reashm Bhargava, for the petitioner.
Counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press
this appeal.
Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
(PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL), J
teekam S.No.79
“All corrections made in the judgment/ order have been incorporated in the judgment/ order being emailed.”
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dropadi
- respondent
Hansraj
Coram
Prashant Kumar Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/1329/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court