The petitioner in this contempt petition submitted via counsel that compliance with the impugned order had been made. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Contempt petition dismissed. Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR.
S. B. ~i vi 1 Contempt Peti ti on NO 666/2015 ~ari Ram ~houdhary
'f S
shri OP ~ai ni and ors
DATE OF Order : 1/12/2016 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Mr. RK Sahrma for the peti ti oner/s .
earned counsel for the petitioner has submi tted that compl i ance of the order under contempt has been made.
In view of the statenlent made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is di smi ssed. ~ul e di scharqed.
ari Ram ~houdhary
shri OP ~ai ni and ors
Mahesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
