The appellants challenged a conversion of land from agricultural to industrial use. The bench referred to a related judgment, held no merit in the appeals regarding land conversion powers and rules, and dismissed the special appeals.
The Special Appeals were dismissed with a direction to place a copy of the judgment in all files.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.
D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.624/2013
( M/S S.S. INT UDYOG V/S STATE OF RAJ. & ORS.)
DATE OF ORDER
02.02.2015
HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR, J HON'BLE MISS JAISHREE THAKUR, J
Mr. Vishal Jangid for the appellant.
The facts and issues raised in this Special Appeal are covered by the Division Bench judgment of this court in D.B.Civil Special Appeal No.544/2013 “M/s Jai Shri Bricks Manufacturing vs. State of Rajasthan” and other connected matters, decided on 14.11.2014 in which it was held as follows:
2
under the Rajasthan Land Revenue (Conversion of Agricultural Land for Non-2 Agricultural Purposes in Rural Areas) Rules, 2007.
We do not find that any new or fresh ground has been raised in
this Special Appeal. The Special Appeal is dismissed.
[JAISHREE THAKUR],J. [GOVIND MATHUR], J.
Anil Singh
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the conversion of khatedari agricultural land to industrial purposes under Section 90A conflicts with the powers of a Mining Engineer to grant a mining lease.
Whether there is any challenge to the validity of the 2007 Conversion Rules regarding the procedure and rates specified thereunder.
Whether the land in question qualifies as khatedari land situated in rural areas.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
M/s S.S. Int. Udyog
State of Rajasthan
Govind Mathur
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
