The Division Bench dismissed the appeal as the legal issue was already settled by its own earlier judgment dated 17.10.2006 in the case of Kusum Kumari, relying on the principle of precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
J U D G M E N T
D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (WRIT) NO.269/2006
Om Prakash & Ors. Versus
State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Date of Judgment :: 24.02.2015
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Mr. Rajendra Katariya for the appellants Mr. K.L. Thakur, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents
BY THE COURT :
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the appeals of similar nature have already been dismissed by this court by the judgment dated 17.10.2006.
Having considered the judgment referred above given in the case of Kusum Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.166/2006], we are satisfied that the issue in question has already been settled by Division Bench of this court. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment in the case of Kusum Kumari (supra).
[JAISHREE THAKUR], J. [GOVIND MATHUR], J.
Pramod
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kusum Kumari Vs. State of RajasthanFollowed¶12
Kusum Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.166/2006]
Om Prakash & Ors.
State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Govind Mathur
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
