This is a single line order where counsel for both parties agreed that the writ application became infructuous, leading the court to dismiss it without substantive discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19909/2013
Shreyans Godika
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Date of Order :: 19.1.2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Mr.Vigyan Shah for petitioner. Mr.Sandeep Pathak for respondents.
<><><>
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ application has become infructuous.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner agrees
with the aforesaid statement.
The writ application is dismissed for having become
infructuous.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA), J.
Item No.143 Sunil/PA
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.
(Sunil Solanki)
P.A.
Shreyans Godika
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
