The petitioner challenged the alteration of his bus routes by RSRTC without a hearing. The Court held the petitioner had no right to a specific route and noted an arbitration remedy exists in the agreement. The writ petition was dismissed in limine.
The writ petition was dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BAJRANG SINGH VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1234/15)
Dated:- 5.2.15.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA
Ms. Suman Choudhary, for the petitioner.
2
(SANGEET LODHA),J.
Aditya/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to interfere in the change of bus routes assigned by the RSRTC to the petitioner.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a hearing before the change of bus routes under the agreement entered with RSRTC.
BAJRANG SINGH
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SANGEET LODHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
