Dismissed

Gulam Mustafa and Ors. v. Mukhtiyar Ahmed and Ors.

Rajasthan HC2 Mar 2015CSA/138/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a civil second appeal under Section 100 CPC. The court held that no substantial question of law arose, affirming the lower courts' concurrent dismissal of the suit for permanent and mandatory injunctions, noting the prior compromise decree was not binding on present parties.

What did the court decide?

The second appeal filed by the appellants/plaintiffs is dismissed. No costs.

Gulam Mustafa and Ors. Vs Mukhtiyar Ahmed and Ors. — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2015)

¶1

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.138/2014 Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar Ahmed & Ors.

¶2

Order dated 02/03/2015

¶3

1 of 7

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶5

::: O R D E R :::

¶6

S. B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No.138/2014

¶7

Gulam Musata S/o Sh. Anwar & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar Ahmed S/o Sh. Hanif Mullah & Ors.

¶8

Date of Order

¶9

nd ::: 02 March, 2015 .

¶10

P R E S E N T

¶11

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

Mr. Rajesh Joshi, for the appellants/plaintiffs. Mr. Rajat Dave, for the respondents/defendants.

¶14

¶15

The appellants (plaintiffs) Gulam Musatafa and three others have preferred the present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, assailing the impugned judgment and decree dated 07.04.2014 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Nagaur, dismissing plaintiffs' Appeal No.03/2014 - Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar & Ors., and upheld the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2014 passed by learned Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Nagaur, in Civil Original Suit No.2/2010 (108/2011) -Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar & Ors., whereby the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs against the respondents/defendants for permanent and mandatory injunction

¶16

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.138/2014 Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar Ahmed & Ors.

¶17

Order dated 02/03/2015

¶18

2 of 7

¶19

with respect to 8-9 Feet wide way, has been dismissed but the counter claim of the defendant, Mukhtiyar Ahmed & Ors, was decreed in their favour.

¶20

The learned trial court vide judgment and decree dated 25.01.2014 dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs/appellants. The relevant para/s of the judgment dated 25.01.2014 reads as under: -

¶21

“इस पक�र तनक� स�ख�� 1 व 2 क� ववननश� अन�स�र जबकक व�द�गण र�जक�� उच� प�थम!क ववद�ल� स�ख�� 2 क� उतर� तरफ , स�व&जननक र�सत� व स�व&जननक �(क हन� क� तथ� क स�बबत नह�� कर प�� ह. एव� तनक� स�ख�� 3 क� ववननश� अन�स�र पनतव�द�गण अपन� !क�न क� दक1ण2 द�व�र ख4सक�कर ववद�ल� क� द�व�र व सव�� क� द�व�र क� ब2� ससथनत र�सत� व �(क क� भ7म! !क�न !8 म!ल�न� क� तथ� व�द�गण स�बबत नह�� ह* प�� ह. मलह�ज� व�द�गण क� व�द ववरद पनतव�द�गण !�सख;��र अह!द वग<र� क� ववरद 4�ररज कक�� ज�न� �ग� प�� ज�त� ह< ककनत� तनक� स�ख�� 4 व 5 क� ववननश� अन�स�र पनतव�द�गण व�द�गण क� ववरद आज�पक व��द�श क� डEक� प�प करन� क� अधIक�र� पकट हत� ह<।

¶22

आद�श

¶23

मलह�ज� व�द�गण ग�ल�! !�सतफ� वग<र� क� ओर स� पसत�त व�द ब�बत आद�श 1 नन�! 8 स2 प2 स2 ववरद पनतव�द�गण असव2क�र कर 4�ररज कक�� ज�त� ह< ककनत� पनतव�द�गण क� ओर स� पसत�त पनतद�व� ( क�उनटर कल�! ) सव2क�र कक�� ज�कर आद�श दद�� ज�त� ह< कक -

¶24

आज�पक व��द�श इस आद�श क� ज�र� कक�� ज�त� ह< कक व�द�गण पनतव�द�गण क� पट�स�द� ज��ग� !हलल� सजनदर�न ब�सन2 !8 ज !�क& ए ब2 स2 E2 ई एफ ज2 ए� आई ज� क� स� जव�बद�व� क� स�लगन बल7वपनट नकश� !8 दमश&त ह< !8 पनतव�द�गण क� उप�ग-उपभग, नन!�&ण आदद !8 ककस2 पक�र क�

¶25

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.138/2014 Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar Ahmed & Ors.

¶26

Order dated 02/03/2015

¶27

3 of 7

¶28

ब�I� रक�वट न त* सव�� कर� न ककस2 अन� स� कर�व8।

¶29

4��& प1क�र�न अपन�-अपन� वहन कर8ग�।

¶30

उपरक�न�स�र डEक� पर�� ज�र� ह।

¶31

Sd/(आश�त*ष ग(मसनह�) अनत. मसववल न��I2श (क.4.) एव� न��न�क !सजसU�ट पथ! वग&, न�ग(र।"

¶32

The first appeal filed by the appellants/plaintiffs was also dismissed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Nagaur, vide judgment and decree dated 07.04.2014. The relevant portion of the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2014 reads as under: -

¶33

“ह!�र� न��न�क ववव�क�न�स�र सव&पथ! �ह तथ� !ह;वप7ण& ह< कक !7ल व�द क� तहत अप2ल�थVगण द�र� �ह अन�तष ��ह� ग�� ह< कक प7व& !8 ववव�ददत र�सत� क� स�ब�I द�व� न��ल� क� स!1 प�श कक�� ग�� सजसक� तहत प1क�र�न !8 र�ज2न�!� प�श कर र�जक�� उच� प�थम!क ववद�ल� स�.2 क� उतर !8 ससथत स�वज&ननक !�ग& व �क क� भ7म! क बतर र�सत� घवषत कक�� ग��, अत: सजस र�सत� क� ववव�द प7व& !8 �ल� व प7व& !8 सजस र�सत� क 4�ल�स� र4न� क� आद�श दद�� ग�� थ� , उसस� पर� ज�कर अब अप2ल�थVगण !��ग नह�� कर सकत�। �ह तथ� !ह;वप7ण& ह< कक उक प7वV द�व�र क� तहत सजस र�सत� क* क��! र4न� क� आज� द� गई थ2, उसक� स�ब�I !8 अप2ल�थVगण क� द�र� पदश& E2.3 नकश� ज* प7व& द�व� क� कम!शर द�र� कस2द कक�� ग�� तथ� प7व& द�व� क� डEक� पदश& E2.8 !ह;वप7ण& दसत�व�ज प�श कक�� ग��। इन दसत�व�ज�त क� अवलकन स� !(क� पर ए स� ब2 क� पसश! !8 ब2 स2 स� दक1ण !8, स2. E2 क� पसश! !8 ई. E2. क� दक1ण !8, ई एफ क� पसश! !8 व एफ. ज2. क� उतर !8 भ7म! क स�व&. !�ग& ह�त� 4�ल� र4� ग��। उक स�ब�I !8 उक र�सत� क� तथ�Z ह�त� ज* स�क� अप2ल�थVगण क� तहत !7ल व�द !8 अI2नसथ न��ल� क� स!1 प�श क� गई, उस!8 प2 E.1 ग�ल�!

¶34

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.138/2014 Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar Ahmed & Ors.

¶35

Order dated 02/03/2015

¶36

4 of 7

¶37

!�सतफ� इस बबनद� क* सव2क�र करत� ह< कक पथ!त: वह ब�सन2 क� सथ�ई ननव�स2 नह�� ह< स�थ ह� गव�ह न� इस बबनद� क* सव2क�र कक�� ह< कक सक7 ल क� आस पडस लमब�ई �(ड�इ क� स�ब�I !8 उस कई ज�नक�र� नह�� ह< न ह� कई नकश� इस स�ब�I !8 बन�कर प�श कक�� ह<। सक7 ल क� क�वल एक ग�ट ह<, सक7 ल क� ��रZ ओर 10-10 फ�ट ऊ_ �2 द�व�र बन2 ह�ई ह<, सक7 ल क� ग�ट दक1ण क� तरफ ह< सजसक� दरव�ज� लग� ह�आ ह<। ग�ट क� स�!न� 4�ल� �क ह<। स�थ ह� गव�ह �ह बबनद� भ2 सव2क�र करत� ह< कक प7व&वतV !�कद!8 क� नकश� पदश& E2.1 सजस!8 एब2स2E2ई र�सत� बत�� ग�� ह. और एब2स2E2ई क� अल�व�अन� कई र�सत� आ! ग�जरक� मलए नह�� ह<, इस नकश� !8 ज आसपडस प7व& व�द�गण द�र� मल4� ग�� ह. व<स� ह� ह<। �ह तथ� !ह;वप7ण& ह< कक इस पदश& E2.1 क� तहत सक7 ल क� उतर� ददश� स� ध�पत� ह�ए र�सपE�नट क� !क�न बत�� ग�� ह< सजसक� !ध� कई र�सत� उलल�ख4त नह�� ह<। र�सपE�नट क� दक1ण !8 सक7 ल आ��ह�आ ह< और पसश! !8 र�सत� आ�� ह�आ ह<। इस बबनद� क* भ2 �ह सव2क�र करत� ह<। इस बबनद� क* भ2 उसन� सव2क�र कक�� ह< कक पनत./र�सपE�नट अपन2 प�र�न2 द�व�र क आI2 तडकर प�न: नन!�&ण करव� रह� ह<, क�वल !�त इसमलए उनक� द�र� �ह द�व� प�श कक�� ग�� ह< र�सत� क� व प7व& द�व� क� उक ससथनत क प2E.2 क� द�र� भ2 सव2क�र कक�� ग�� ह<। पदश& E2.1 !8 ज* र�सत� एब2स2E2ई अ�ककत ह<, वह र�सत� आज भ2 !(ज7द ह<। इसक� अल�व� अन� कई र�सत� उपलबI नह�� ह<। �ह गव�ह भ2 इस बबनद� क सव2क�र करत� ह< कक र�सप*. क� दक1ण !8 सक7 ल ह<। क!ब�श �ह� ससथनत प2E.3 क� ह<। �ह !क�न तथ� सक7 ल क� !ध� ककस2 अन� र�सत� क� !(ज7दग2 नह�� दश�&त� ह< और इस बबनद� क� त�ईद करत� ह< कक प7व& !8 ज र�सत� क� !(ज7दग2 नह�� दश�&त� ह< और इस बबनद� क� त�ईद करत� ह< कक प7व& !8 ज* र�सत� छड� ग�� थ� उस2 स� व� आत� ज�त� ह<। प2E.4 भ2 उक ससथनत क ह� सपष करत� ह< प7व& !8 वह सक7 ल क� दक1ण !8 ककस2 गल� क� स�ब�I !8 क*ई !�कद!� नह�� कक��। स2!�ओ� क� स�ब�I !8 �ह गव�ह भ2 �ह तथ� सपष करत� ह< कक !�सखत��र क�

¶38

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.138/2014 Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar Ahmed & Ors.

¶39

Order dated 02/03/2015

¶40

5 of 7

¶41

!क�न प7व& !8 �क, उसक� ब�द ह�ज2 इस!�ईल क� !क�न ह<, पसश! स� र�सत�, उतर !8 सरद�र क� !क�न व दक1ण !8 सक7 ल ह<। गव�ह इस स�झ�व क सव2क�र करत� ह< कक !�कद!� सक7 ल क� आग� �क क� स�ब�I !8 नह�� कक�� ग�� ह< अवपत� गल� क� मलए कक�� ग�� ह< और इस तथ� क भ2 सव2क�र करत� ह< कक सक7 ल क� पसश! !8 गल� ह<। �ह गल� पसश! व�ल� दक1ण2 ददश� व�ल� गल� !8 ज�त2 ह<। इसक� अल�व� अन� कई गल� !(ज7द नह�� ह<। अब गव�ह�न क� �ह कहन� कक र�सपE�नट अपन2 स2!� स� पर� ज�कर नन!�&ण क��& कर रह� ह<, इस स�ब�I !8 न त* सक7 ल क� कई पट� �� स2!� न�प�प प�श कक�� ह< और न ह� ववपर�त !�क� र�सपE�नट क� पट� क� कई 4�Eन कक�� ज� रह� ह<। प2E.5 भ2 इस तथ� क* सव2क�र करत� ह< कक र�सपE�नट !क�न क� दक1ण !8 सक7 ल ह< ज र�सत� पहल� 4�ल�� ग�� थ� वह आज भ2 !(क� पर !(ज7द ह<। �ह� ससथनत प2E .6 ज* सव�� कम!शर ह< व सजसक� द�र� न��ल� क� आद�श स� !(क� !�आ�न� कक�� ग�� ह< , इस बबनद� क* सव2क�र करत� ह< कक ववव�ददत स�पनत क� दक1ण !8 सक7 ल ह<। मलह�ज� अप2ल�थVगण प�थम!क त(र पर �ह ससथनत स�बबत करन� !8 सफल नह�� रह� ह< कक सक7 ल तथ� र�सपE�नट क� !क�न क� !ध� ककस2 पक�र क� कई गल� �� र�सत� पदश& E2.1 !8 दश�&�� ई स� स2, स2 स� E2, ए स� ब2 व E2 स� स2 र�सत� क� अल�व� !(ज7द ह*।

¶42

आद�श

¶43

अप2ल अप2ल�थVगण ववरद र�सप*E�नट 4�ररज क� ज�त2 ह<। अI2नसथ न��ल� क� ननण&� ददन��ककत 25.1.14 �थ�वत र4� ज�त� ह<।

¶44

Sd/(!�Iव2 ददनकर) अनतररक सजल� एव� स�शन न��I2श न�ग(र (र�ज)”

¶45

Mr. Rajesh Joshi, learned counsel for the

¶46

appellants/plaintiffs submits that the learned courts below have erred

¶47

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.138/2014 Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar Ahmed & Ors.

¶48

Order dated 02/03/2015

¶49

6 of 7

¶50

in allowing the counter claim filed by the respondents/defendants without there being relief of declaration in the counter claim and, therefore, both the courts below have erred in rejecting plaintiffs' suit. He further submitted that the learned courts below have erred in not decreeing the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs though the plaintiffs' easementary rights were confirmed by a competent civil court vide judgment dated 03.02.1996 and the same being a compromise decree in a suit for representative character, the same was binding on all the residents including the plaintiffs and defendants.

¶51

On the other hand, Mr. Rajat Dave, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants submitted that both the courts below after evaluating the evidence led by the parties has concurrently dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs, which calls for no interference in the present second appeal. He, therefore, submitted that no substantial questions of law arises in the present second appeal and same deserves dismissal.

¶52

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, and upon perusal of the judgments and decree of the two courts below, this Court is of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises in the present second appeal of the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the present second appeal deserves dismissal. Both the courts below after discussing the relevant evidence led by the parties have rightly and concurrently dismissed the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction against the

¶53

S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.138/2014 Gulam Mustafa & Ors. Vs. Mukhtiyar Ahmed & Ors.

¶54

Order dated 02/03/2015

¶55

respondents/defendants. The present suit involved a different cause of action and earlier findings in the compromise decree dated 03.02.1996 were rightly held not binding the present parties to the suit. This Court does not find any ground to upset the judgments and decree passed by the two courts below.

¶56

Resultantly, the present second appeal filed by the appellants/plaintiffs assailing the concurrent judgment and decree of the courts below dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiff/appellant is dismissed. No costs. A copy of this judgment be sent to the concerned parties and the courts below forthwith.

¶57

(Dr. VINEET KOTHARI), J.

¶58

DJ/3

Gulam Mustafa and Ors. v. Mukhtiyar Ahmed and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulam Mustafa and Ors. v. Mukhtiyar Ahmed and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Lal Vs M/S Jain Bros.

Surendra Kumar Vs Ram Chandra and Ors.

Surendra Kumar Agarwal Vs Naresh Kumar Sidana

Gattu Devi @ Laxmidevi Vs Prarelal

Dhanraj Mali Vs Nirbhay Singh and Ors.

Lr'S of Uda Vs Lr'S of Mangu and Ors.