Allowed

Vishal Navriya v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC9 Oct 2015CRLR/1322/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed a revision petition by a juvenile, Vishal Navriya, challenging the dismissal of his bail applications by the trial and appellate courts. The court held that the juvenile deserves release on bail upon his mother submitting a bond of two lacs with two sureties of one lakh each, subject to producing the juvenile before the Juvenile Justice Board as called.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail upon submission of bail bonds totaling Rs. 4,00,000 (principal Rs. 2,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each) and undertaking to produce the juvenile before the Juvenile J

Vishal Navriya Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶2

O R D E R

¶3

S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1322/2015 ( Vishal Navriya Vs. State of Rajasthan)

¶4

DATE OF ORDER ::::: 9.10.2015

¶5

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶6

Mr. Hemraj Rodiya, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, Public Prosecutor for State.

¶7

This revision petition has been filed by the Juvenile Vishal Navriya through his mother- Smt. Kanta , under Sec.53 read with Sec.12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children Act) against the order dated 5.10.2015 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Tonk (hereinafter 'the appellate court') in Cr.Appeal No. 82/2015 by which the appeal filed by the juvenile has been dismissed and affirmed the order dated 29.9.2015 passed by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Tonk (hereinafter 'the trial court') dismissing the bail application filed by juvenile under Sec.12 of the Act has been affirmed.

¶8

Briefly stated facts of the case are that an FIR bearing No.238/2015 came to be lodged at PS- Kotwali District Tonk under Secs. 377 IPC and Sec. 6,5 of POSCO Act wherein the concerned police arrested the petitioner and after completion of investigation, filed challan before the trial court where the case is pending.

¶9

On the basis of said FIR, the juvenile was arrested by the police. Thereafter the juvenile through his mother Smt. Kanta filed bail application before the trial court but the same was rejected. Against the said order, the juvenile filed a criminal appeal, but the same was also dismissed by the learned appellate court. Against the said order, this revision petition has been preferred.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

¶11

Upon hearing the arguments of the counsel for the juvenile and the Public Prosecutor, in my view the juvenile Vishal Navriya s/o Shri Narayan , deserves to be released on bail provided his mother Smt. Kanta submits bail bonds in the amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (rupees two lacs) with two sureties in the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lack only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he will produce the juvenile before the juvenile Justice Board on all dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so during the pendency of enquiry.

¶12

This revision petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶13

(Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J.

¶14

NKS "All corrections made in the judgment/ order have been incorporated in the judgment /order being emailed."

¶15

Narendra Kumar Sharma Private Stecretary

Vishal Navriya v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Navriya v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mridula Bhatnagar Vs Raj Non Gov Edu and Ors.

Kamal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Smt Janki Bai @ Ramjanki Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Radhey Shyam Meena Vs U O I and Ors.

Jaipur Development Authority J Vs Shri Sudhir Kumar and Ors.

Dhruv Singh Choudhary Vs State Medical and Healthanr