Court dismissed a bail application where the accused-applicant was absent and deemed uninterested. The court found no grounds for bail considering the prosecutrix's statement.
Bail application dismissed; accused-applicant not enlarged on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Application No.8371/2015
(Mohammed Ishan Vs. State of Rajasthan)
Date of Order : 24th August, 2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI
None is present for the accused-applicant. Mr.Sudesh Saini, Public Prosecutor – for the State.
By the Court:
None appears for the accused-applicant, though the case called twice.
It seems that accused-applicant is not interested to pursue this bail application.
In view of the aforesaid as well as looking to the facts, which includes statements of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., I do not find any ground to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. Hence, this bail application is dismissed.
(M.N. BHANDARI),J.
S/No.9 Preeti, PA All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.
Preeti Asopa P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused-applicant in light of the prosecutrix's statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammed Ishan
State of Rajasthan
M.N. Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
