Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous after respondents reported compliance with the impugned order; petitioner did not dispute the fact.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.417/2015
IN
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.15037/2012
DR. RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. VS. ASHWINI BHAGAT & ANR.
Date of order
: 05/08/2015.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Shri Lokendra Singh Shekhawat for the petitioners. Shri Inderjeet Singh, Addl. Advocate General for the respondents.
Shri Inderjeet Singh, learned Additional
Advocate General for the respondents submits that the compliance has been made, therefore, this contempt petition has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not
dispute the aforesaid fact.
The contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ), J.
RS/101
All corrections made in the judgement/order have been incorporated in the judgement/order being emailed. (Ravi Sharma,P.A.)
DR. RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA & ORS.
ASHWINI BHAGAT & ANR.
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
