t he compr omi se whi ch was execut ed bet ween t he l i t i gat i ng par t i es f or t he sui t pr oper t y i n quest i on, at t he same t i me t he pr esent appel l ant has f i l ed a r egul ar ci vi l sui t f or decl ar at i on & per manent i nj unct i on i mpl eadi ng t he pr esent r espondent as one of t he def endant and t he sui t came t o be par t i al l y decr eed vi de j udgment & decr ee dt . 16. 05. 2003 and t hat i s t he subj ect mat t er of chal l enge i n Regul ar Fi r st Appeal No. 273/ 2003 at t he i nst ance of t he pr esent r espondent and af t er hear i ng t he par t i es i nt er i m or der came t o be passed pr ot ect i ng t he r i ght s of t he par t i es pendi ng adj udi cat i on i n a Regul ar Ci vi l Fi r st Appeal No. 273/ 2003 dt . 03. 01. 2006 but t hi s f act was compl et el y conceal ed when t he pr oceedi ngs wer e i ni t i at ed bef or e t he Gr am Panchayat and per mi ssi on at one st age was gr ant ed t o t he appel l ant f or r ai si ng const r uct i on over t he sui t pr oper t y i n quest i on. However , t hat came t o be r ect i f i ed at a l at er st age i mmedi at el y when t hi s f act was br ought t o t he not i ce and t he l ear ned Si ngl e Judge af t er t he par t i es bei ng hear d t ook not e of t he pr oceedi ngs i ni t i at ed at t he i nst ance of t he par t i es f or t he sui t pr oper t y i n quest i on and f i nal l y ar r i ved t o t he concl usi on t hat apar t f r om t he pr ocedur e f ol l owed by t he Gr am Panchayat gr ant i ng per mi ssi on i n a mat t er wher e ci vi l sui t was pendi ng at a l at er st age has been par t i al l y decr eed and a ci vi l f i r st appeal i s pendi ng i n t hi s Cour t and t he i nt er se r i ght s of par t i es have been pr ot ect ed by an i nt er i m or der dt . 03. 01. 2006, what i s bei ng pr ayed f or by t he
