The petitioner informed the Court that the writ petition had become infructuous. The petition was dismissed on those grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9399/2006 Sunil Kumar Sharma
Vs.
R.R.V.P.N.Ltd. & Anr.
Date of Order
:::: 16.05.2014
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod Goyal on behalf of
Mr. Virendra Lodha, for the respondents.
Learned counsel Mr. Mukesh Agarwal appearing on behalf of the petitioner, under the instructions, informs this Court that this petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed for having become infructuous.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
Pcg/57
All corrections made in judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed. P.C.Gupta, P.A.
Sunil Kumar Sharma
R.R.V.P.N.Ltd.
VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
