The High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation filed by Nena Ram & Ors. against the State & Ors., permitting the petitioner to withdraw the petition and advising against further proceedings.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; PIL dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29
D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.702/2013.
(PIL Matter)
Nena Ram & Ors. Vs. State & Ors.
Date of Order :: 12th February 2014.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA
Mr.Rajvendra Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Panwar AAG
<><><>
BY THE COURT:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that having regard to the circumstances of the case, the petitioner shall stand advised not to proceed with this petition filed as Public Interest Litigation but to take recourse to the appropriate remedies in accordance with law; and with such liberty for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw.
Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to it. Permission granted.
Accordingly, this Public Interest Litigation stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(BANWARI LAL SHARMA),J. (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J.
MAMTA
Nena Ram & Ors.
State & Ors.
Dinesh Maheshwari
Banwari Lal Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
