This order records the dismissal of Civil Writ Petition No. 1838/2011 for default due to the absence of the petitioners' counsel despite public notice, while the respondent appeared in person.
Dismissal of the writ petition and stay application in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR
O R D E R
S. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 1838/ 2011 Chotelal & Ors. vs. Civil Judge (JD) Laxmangarh, Alwar & Anr.
Date of Order : 5th September, 2014
HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE R. S. CHAUHAN
None pr esent f or t he pet i t i oner s. Mr . Gopesh, t he r espondent NO. 2, pr esent i n per son.
Despi t e i ssuance of publ i c not i ce by t hi s Cour t i nvi t i ng l i t i gant s t o come and pl ead t hei r case i n absence of t hei r counsel , no one has appear ed on behal f of t he pet i t i oner s. Ther ef or e, t hi s wr i t pet i t i on as wel l as t he st ay appl i cat i on ar e, her eby, di smi ssed i n def aul t .
( R. S. CHAUHAN) , J.
Mak/-
41
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”
Anil Makawana
P.A.
Chotelal & Ors.
Civil Judge (JD) Laxmangarh, Alwar
Anr.
R. S. CHAUHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
