None present for petitioners despite public notice. Writ petition dismissed in default.
Writ petition dismissed in default of appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR
O R D E R
S. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 15850/ 2010
Radhey Shyam & Anr. vs. The Addl. District Judge No.2, Alwar & Ors.
Date of Order : 9th September, 2014
HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE R. S. CHAUHAN
None pr esent f or t he pet i t i oner s.
Despi t e i ssuance of publ i c not i ce by t hi s Cour t i nvi t i ng l i t i gant s t o come and pl ead t hei r case i n absence of t hei r counsel , nei t her t he pet i t i oner s, nor t hei r counsel have appear ed bef or e t hi s Cour t . Ther ef or e, t hi s wr i t pet i t i on i s, her eby, di smi ssed i n def aul t .
( R. S. CHAUHAN) , J.
Mak/-
44
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”
Anil Makawana
P.A.
Radhey Shyam & Anr.
The Addl. District Judge No.2, Alwar & Ors.
R. S. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
