In S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 222/2007, the High Court at Jodhpur heard an application under Order XXIII, Rule 1 CPC for disposing of the appeal based on a compromise between the parties. The court allowed the application and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
The appeal was allowed in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
: J U D G M E N T :
S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.222/2007
Om Prakash
Vs.
Bunty @ Arun
Date of Judgment :: 6.5.2014
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Mr. Vikram Choudhary for Mr. Manish Shishodia, for the appellant/s. Mr. Bhawani Singh for Mr. Chaitanya Gahlot, for the respondent/s.
BY THE COURT:
Heard learned counsel for the parties on application filed by the appellant under Order XXIII, Rule 1 CPC for disposal of the appeal in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
For the reasons indicated in the application supported by affidavit, the same is allowed. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
(ARUN BHANSALI), J.
rm/38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be disposed of on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties under Order XXIII, Rule 1 CPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Om Prakash
Bunty @ Arun
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
