Allowed
Wolf Gang Hatz and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.
Rajasthan HCCRLMA/32/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a miscellaneous application to correct specific typographical errors in a previous order, ruling that the corrections, which involved substituting words like 'FIR' with 'complaint' and swapping 'petitioner' with 'respondent', were to be read as part of the impugned order.
What did the court decide?
Application to correct typographical errors in the order dated 14.12.2013 allowed; corrections to be read in the original order.