The single judge disposed of the writ petition relying on a previous decision, directing respondents to consider the petitioner's representation regarding benefits. A stay application was also disposed of.
Respondents directed to consider representation for benefits; if covered by prior judgment, extend benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8940/2012
Deendayal Sunariwal
Versus
The Director, Elementary Education & Anr.
DATE OF ORDER : 08/04/2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI
Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat, for petitioner
It is stated that the issue involved in this case has already been decided by this court in bunch of writ petitions led by “Smt Shailesh Verma & Anr. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.”, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1839/2009, decided on 05.09.2012 . Petitioner wants to make a representation to the respondents for granting benefits as have been granted in the above case.
In view of aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. In case of representation, respondents are directed to consider and decide the same. If it is covered by the judgment cited above, then to extend the benefits to the petitioner. In case it is not covered, petitioner may be conveyed the same by a speaking order. This disposes of stay application also.
[M.N.BHANDARI], J.
FRBOHRA/8940CWP2012.doc
Certificate:
“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”
FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt Shailesh Verma & Anr. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1839/2009Referred¶9
Deendayal Sunariwal
The Director, Elementary Education
M.N. BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
