Partly allowed

Sharwan Kumar Pareek v. State Education Dep Anr.

Rajasthan HC1 Mar 2013CW/3235/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to respondents to consider his case in light of the Naresh Kumar Sharma judgment, subject to other eligibility, merit, and the final outcome of an appeal filed in the cited case.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to make a representation to be considered within one month, subject to eligibility, merit, and the outcome of a pending appeal.

Sharwan Kumar Pareek Vs State Education Dep Anr. — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2013)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3235/2013

¶4

Sharwan Kumar Pareek

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan & Anr.

¶7

DATE OF ORDER : 01/03/2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI

¶8

Mr. Sharwan Kumar Pareek, Petitioner (Self)

¶9

¶10

Learned counsel submits that issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan &

¶11

Anr. ( SBCWP No.3414/2009 & 3 other connected petitions ). The aforesaid decision was given after hearing both the parties, thus petitioner/s may be given liberty to make a representation to respondents to consider his/their case in the light of the judgment aforesaid.

¶12

In view of the prayer made, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. If any representation is made, respondents are directed to look into the same and if case of petitioner/s is covered by the judgment in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma (supra), his/their case may also be considered in the light of the directions given in the judgment aforesaid subject to other eligibility and the merit. It may be in his/their

¶13

¶14

category. Consideration aforesaid may be made within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order and representation.

¶15

The consideration would, however, be made to the extent of posts advertised and the order passed in this case would remain subject to final outcome of the appeal as it is recently informed that an appeal has been preferred in the case supra, thus petitioner/s has/have agreed to abide the final outcome of the appeal. Accordingly, if judgment in the case supra is reversed, then this order would be rendered ineffective.

¶16

[M.N.BHANDARI], J.

¶17

FRBOHRA/3235CWP2013.doc

¶18

Certificate:

¶19

“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”

¶20

FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.

Sharwan Kumar Pareek v. State Education Dep Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharwan Kumar Pareek v. State Education Dep Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Singh Vs State and Ors.

Himmat Singh Meena Vs State Education Departmentanr

Suresh Chandra Barodia Vs State Home Departmentors

Puran Singh Solanki Vs State Education Departmentanr

Jitendra Singh Vs State Panchayati Raj Dep Ors.

Subhash Bhardwaj Vs State Treasury and Acco Anr.