Rs.500/- with the condition for enhancement @ 20%, after every three years, which was to be treated additional rent to be computed on the basic rent Rs.500/-. It was also a condition incorporated specifically that ordinarily the premises shall not be vacated by the Panchayat Samiti, however, in case of violation of any of the conditions by the allottee, the premises was liable to be vacated by Panchayat Samiti, after giving three months' notice. It is a common ground between the parties that the agreement between parties was executed in terms of the advertisement issued and the petitioners have not violated any of the conditions of the agreement. Thus, even according to the respondents, in absence of any breach of conditions of the agreement, but for the provisions of Rule 164 of the Rules of 1996, ordinarily, the premises in question are not liable to be vacated. 19. It is not disputed before this court that prior to framing of the Rules of 1996, there was no provision incorporated in the Act or the Rules made thereunder in force at the relevant time, governing the letting out of the Buildings and Shops belonging to the Panchayat Samiti and thus, the matter with regard to letting out of the premises was to be governed by the agreement arrived at between the parties and the matter with regard to eviction of the unauthorised occupants over the public premises was to be dealt with in accordance with the procedure laid down under the Act of 1964.
